
Arizona Revised Statutes
A. If the state has filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty and
the defendant is convicted of first degree murder, the trier of fact at the
sentencing proceeding shall determine whether to impose a sentence of death in
accordance with the procedures provided in this section. If the trier of fact
determines that a sentence of death is not appropriate, or if the state has not
filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty, and the defendant is
convicted of first degree murder, the court shall determine whether to impose a
sentence of life or natural life.
B. Before trial, the prosecution shall notice one or more of the aggravating
circumstances under section 13-751, subsection F.
C. If the trier of fact finds the defendant guilty of first degree murder, the
trier of fact shall then immediately determine whether one or more alleged
aggravating circumstances have been proven. This proceeding is the aggravation
phase of the sentencing proceeding.
D. If the trier of fact finds that one or more of the alleged aggravating
circumstances have been proven, the trier of fact shall then immediately
determine whether the death penalty should be imposed. This proceeding is the
penalty phase of the sentencing proceeding.
E. At the aggravation phase, the trier of fact shall make a special finding on
whether each alleged aggravating circumstance has been proven based on the
evidence that was presented at the trial or at the aggravation phase. If the
trier of fact is a jury, a unanimous verdict is required to find that the
aggravating circumstance has been proven. If the trier of fact unanimously finds
that an aggravating circumstance has not been proven, the defendant is entitled
to a special finding that the aggravating circumstance has not been proven. If
the trier of fact unanimously finds no aggravating circumstances, the court
shall then determine whether to impose a sentence of life or natural life on the
defendant.
F. The penalty phase shall be held immediately after the trier of fact finds at
the aggravation phase that one or more of the aggravating circumstances under
section 13-751, subsection F have been proven. A
finding by the trier of fact that any of the remaining aggravating circumstances
alleged has not been proven or the inability of the trier of fact to agree on
the issue of whether any of the remaining aggravating circumstances alleged has
been proven shall not prevent the holding of the penalty phase.
G. At the penalty phase, the defendant and the state may present any evidence
that is relevant to the determination of whether there is mitigation that is
sufficiently substantial to call for leniency. In order for the trier of fact to
make this determination, the state may present any evidence that demonstrates
that the defendant should not be shown leniency.
H. The trier of fact shall determine unanimously whether death is the
appropriate sentence. If the trier of fact is a jury and the jury unanimously
determines that the death penalty is not appropriate, the court shall determine
whether to impose a sentence of life or natural life.
I. If the trier of fact at any prior phase of the trial is the same trier of
fact at the subsequent phase, any evidence that was presented at any prior phase
of the trial shall be deemed admitted as evidence at any subsequent phase of the
trial.
J. At the aggravation phase, if the trier of fact is a jury, the jury is unable
to reach a verdict on any of the alleged aggravating circumstances and the jury
has not found that at least one of the alleged aggravating circumstances has
been proven, the court shall dismiss the jury and shall impanel a new jury. The
new jury shall not retry the issue of the defendant's guilt or the issue
regarding any of the aggravating circumstances that the first jury found not
proved by unanimous verdict. If the new jury is unable to reach a unanimous
verdict, the court shall impose a sentence of life or natural life on the
defendant.
K. At the penalty phase, if the trier of fact is a jury and the jury is unable
to reach a verdict, the court shall dismiss the jury and shall impanel a new
jury. The new jury shall not retry the issue of the defendant's guilt or the
issue regarding any of the aggravating circumstances that the first jury found
by unanimous verdict to be proved or not proved. If the new jury is unable to
reach a unanimous verdict, the court shall impose a sentence of life or natural
life on the defendant.
L. If the jury that rendered a verdict of guilty is not the jury first impaneled
for the aggravation phase, the jury impaneled in the aggravation phase shall not
retry the issue of the defendant's guilt. If the jury impaneled in the
aggravation phase is unable to reach a verdict on any of the alleged aggravating
circumstances and the jury has not found that at least one of the alleged
aggravating circumstances has been proven, the court shall dismiss the jury and
shall impanel a new jury. The new jury shall not retry the issue of the
defendant's guilt or the issue regarding any of the aggravating circumstances
that the first jury found not proved by unanimous verdict. If the new jury is
unable to reach a unanimous verdict, the court shall impose a sentence of life
or natural life on the defendant.
M. Alternate jurors who are impaneled for the trial in a case in which the
offense is punishable by death shall not be excused from the case until the
completion of the sentencing proceeding.
N. If the sentence of a person who was sentenced to death is overturned, the
person shall be resentenced pursuant to this section by a jury that is
specifically impaneled for this purpose as if the original sentencing had not
occurred.
O. In any case that requires sentencing or resentencing in which the defendant
has been convicted of an offense that is punishable by death and in which the
trier of fact was a judge or a jury that has since been discharged, the
defendant shall be sentenced or resentenced pursuant to this section by a jury
that is specifically impaneled for this purpose.
P. The trier of fact shall make all factual determinations required by this
section or the Constitution of the United States or this state to impose a death
sentence. If the defendant bears the burden of proof, the issue shall be
determined in the penalty phase. If the state bears the burden of proof, the
issue shall be determined in the aggravation phase.
Q. If the death penalty was not alleged or was alleged but not imposed, the
court shall determine whether to impose a sentence of life or natural life. In
determining whether to impose a sentence of life or natural life, the court:
1. May consider any evidence introduced before sentencing or at any other
sentencing proceeding.
2. Shall consider the aggravating and mitigating circumstances listed in section
13-701 and any statement made by a victim.
R. Subject to section 13-751, subsection B, a victim
has the right to be present at the aggravation phase and to present any
information that is relevant to the proceeding. A victim has the right to be
present and to present information at the penalty phase. At the penalty phase,
the victim may present information about the murdered person and the impact of
the murder on the victim and other family members and may submit a victim impact
statement in any format to the trier of fact.
S. For the purposes of this section:
1. "Trier of fact" means a jury unless the defendant and the state waive a jury,
in which case the trier of fact shall be the court.
2. "Victim" means the murdered person's spouse, parent, child, grandparent or
sibling, any other person related to the murdered person by consanguinity or
affinity to the second degree or any other lawful representative of the murdered
person, except if the spouse, parent, child, grandparent, sibling, other person
related to the murdered person by consanguinity or affinity to the second degree
or other lawful representative is in custody for an offense or is the accused.